Long-term evolution of multiparty democracy and its adverse effect on the native Sanatani culture:

-Bijith Prasantha

How many parties to make before we finally get one who would call a spade a spade, will take the bull of jihaad by the horns, and will work towards the declaration of India as the Hindu Rashtra? Allegedly, Hindus created Congress and hoped that it would unify India across caste and creed. But then Congress gave birth to an uncultivated and stupid political leader like Mohandas Gandhi whose infertile political brain threw the Hindu populace of this country to the deep jaw of jihaad in the name of Pakistani movement and killed millions of Sanatanis before it chopped off both the arms of India, disconnecting it from all neighbours and the nations beyond.

Then Hindus created Janata Party to get rid of the atrocities of the Gandhis. But the Janata Party gifted India the Minority Commission – and legalized again the existence of the jihaadi state within a state. By the time the chaos of Babri issue was dispelled, Hindus found that the State of India had gifted them with a bunch of Sharia-compliant acts to break the teeth of Hindu consolidation phenomena! The Places of Worship Act 1991 prohibited conversion of any place of worship which effectively meant that Hindus could never recover again the Krishna Janmasthan temple, Kashi Vishwanath Temple, Adhai Din ka Jhopda in Ajmer, Adinath temple in Bengal, and the countless temples which were demolished and converted by the jihaadi Ashraafi marauders of Turkey, Arab, and Afghanistan. The Waqf Act 1995 was strengthened in favor of Muslims that, over time, made the Waqf Board the third biggest landowner of India after the Army and the Railways. According to the data of Waqf Management System of India, at present there are a total 8,54,509 properties with Waqf Boards which are spread over more than eight lakh acres of land. The UPA government gifted 123 prime Central Delhi properties to Waqf and withdrew the claim of government right before UPA was kicked out of office in 2014. Right now 77% of Delhi is on Waqf land including the Central Vista, Delhi High Court, CGO Complex and Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium.

The judiciary could not be far behind in this drive! Justice Anands of the Supreme Court, in its 1998 judgement, Case No. 4372 SCR 398, proudly proclaimed the iconic line: ‘Once Waqf, always Waqf’. The Delhi High Court opined that Waqf land is Allah’s and Allah's alone and that the government cannot be the owner of these lands. All this nonsense after giving away one-third of the Akhand Bharat to the Islamists to create Pakistan!

What is the issue here? Where are we getting it wrong? Why is it that the Hindus, in spite of being in majority, are always at the receiving end even after the creation of hundreds of parties after 1947? To understand this, we have to dig up colonial history because this scam really started right after 1857.

Continuity of Muslim Triptikaran Since the British Era:

The Ashraaf monopoly in the important administrative offices was diminished within a few decades after the fall of the radical jihadi Emperor named Aurangzeb. Within one and half centuries from there, the British East India Company captured most parts of the Indian subcontinent. In that empire, from the data of distribution of state power patronage in Bengal in April 1871, it is found that the ratio of Hindu to Muslim in important positions in different offices got reduced to 7 to 1. In 1869, the number of Law Officers of the Crown was 6: 4 Englishmen, 2 Hindus, and 0 Muslim; among the Officers of the High Court, 7 Hindus and 0 Muslim; among the Barrister-at-Law were 3 Hindus or more and 0 Muslim. Among the Attorneys, Proctors and Solicitors of the High Court, there were 27 Hindus and 0 Muslim. Among the graduates in Medicine in 1869, there were 3 Hindus, 1 Englishman, and 0 Muslim; among the Bachelors of Medicine, there were 10 Hindus and 1 Englishman; among Licentiates of Medicine there were 98 Hindus, 5 Englishmen, and 1 Muslim.

When Hindus were beating the Muslim community in all conceivable aspects of life and were presenting themselves as the torchbearers of enlightenment amidst all the chaos of the subcontinent, the British were hatching some other plan.The British identified three key short-comings in Hindu society:

a. Hindus do not have political unity,
b. Hindus are not brave and wise enough in their political demands,
c. Hindus do not have practical knowledge of how to govern a country.

The British opined that, talent, passion, knowledge and dedication could not be good enough criteria to secure a government job because it was leading to a scenario where the timid and docile Hindus were dominating in almost all the government job sectors and the potential nuisance-makers were lagging behind in the competition. Rather than adopting a meritocratic approach and giving special attention to the community that was lagging behind for various historical or socio-political constraints, the British vouched for offering the jobs discriminately to a community that had the potential of being a greater bully and a stronger creator of nuisance otherwise. Hunter argues in his book [The Indian Musalmans: Are They Bound in Conscience to Rebel Against the Queen?, p. 102],

“Is it that the Hindus have all along been better men than the Musalmans, and only required a fair field in order to outstrip them in the race? Or is it that the Musalmans have so many careers open to them in non-official life, that they are indifferent to Government employment, and leave the Hindus to walk over the course? The Hindu has unquestionably a high order of intellect; but an universal and immeasurable superiority on the part of the Hindus, such as would be required to explain their monopoly of official preferment, is unknown at the present day, and is in direct contradiction to their past history. The truth is that when the country passed under our rule, the Musalmans were the superior race, and superior not only in stoutness of heart and strength of arm, but in power of political organization, and in the science of practical government.”

As a result, the British started to appease the most nuisance faction of the country, i.e. the Muslims by giving them jobs disproportionately in police and army, and by funding madrassas and other Ashraafi institutions that were built in the mediaeval age to retain control over the native Muslim populace. The wise use of the Muslims to control the majority Hindu community of India is thus an old playbook of the British Era which was effectively used by the Gandhi family as well in the final half of the twentieth century,-- and now is being used by Modi in the most cunning ways!

A close observation of the current political discourse convinces us of two things. In the coming years: (i) Congress is going to drag the Overton window to the extreme left in coming days to appease the demands of the Ashraafs and radical Islam, (ii) BJP is going to surrender to the same faction in the name of ‘Pasmaanda triptikaran’. In just 75 years after partition, Congress under Rahul Gandhi has declared that Muslim League is a secular organization, while Narendra Modi has opined that Aligarh Muslim University, a college in UP that historically led the Pakistan movement, has played a key role in India’s independence. All these deceits and lies imply that Congress is trying to catch the secular and radical Islamist crowd, while BJP is trying to take a centrist position. Noone cares to keep their focus on catering to the crowd on the right– the oppressed, fragmented, meek, laborious Hindus who have been degraded to second class citizens of India over the last 75 years through various constitutional amendments and law reforms that are inherently communal against the interest of Hindus– the silent slaves who readily pay taxes without ever asking for their rights.

Because BJP is in the process of shaking hands with the Ashraafs in the garb of Pasmaanda appeasement, they have shown no intent to bring to an end the sharia state that exists within the state of India itself. This means that BJP is least interested in the implementation of UCC. BJP have also probably hypothesized some similar short-comings in Hindu society: (1) Hindus do not have political unity, hence Hindutva is always at the behest of BJP, (2) Hindus are not brave and wise enough in their political demands, (3) a common Hindu does not have either any sense of his/her identity or any practical knowledge of governance as much as a common Muslim does, (4) in terms of partisan Hindutva politics, BJP has reached saturation. No more Hindu can be duped by their bogus Hindutva narrative that runs in the media day in and day out but does not serve any practical purpose in the interest of Hindus. These hypotheses have steered the BJP to play the soft card of appeasement and insist their root level karyakartas, many of whom are staunch pro-Hindutva, to knock the door of radical Sufis and Mullas in search of plausible political associations. If we dissociate ourselves momentarily from the mindscape that BJP is trying to build with the venom served by their propaganda news channels, we see that there is not even a single Hindutva issue that Modi’s BJP have touched upon or have been actively vocal about in the last four years since they were re-elected in 2019. Stricting speaking, BJP has addressed only one through abrogating Article 370. But what many don’t know: Article 370 has made a reentry in the Kashmir valley in the form of domicile law. Rest of all the political decisions that BJP has taken in the last four years are mostly anti-Hindu and occasionally pro-Islamic.

Hindu - a silent majority who can be easily fooled:

If religion is the opium of the masses, Hindu Dharma definitely ‘sedates’ the Hindus before they can come to streets and create riot-like situations to blackmail the government with unjustifiable demands. Also, Hindu Dharma is the least political of all ideologies conceived in the history of mankind. It does not have the ambition of world domination, it does not agitate or intimidate its followers with the heaven-hell duality, and it does not have the priest or maulvi class who can toil day in and day out to expand the cult into the house of the kafirs. This makes Hindu Dharma the least aggressive ideology and makes Hindus a peaceful (in the real sense of this word) and silent majority. Moreover, the Hindu institutions and practices have been going through a thousand years of deprecation and destruction. While the Ashraafs converted people with the power of sword, the British subverted the very ethos, the culture, and the core values of Hindu Dharma.

In the absence of continuing passionate discussions and research, the power of Hindu Dharma to captivate the human mind is gradually fading away. Hindu Dharma also does not have the idea of apostasy or blasphemy, therefore no fear of death for maligning and polluting Hindu Dharma unlike Christianity or Islam. This gives the stooges and the enemies to further subvert the Dharma to their political and religious benefits. Instead of being punished, these enemies get rewarded by the international cabals for being the ‘brave reformers of Hinduism’.

Because Hindus do not go to temples very often now-a-days, the government is also least worried about any form of Hindu mass mobilization that could potentially pose a security threat to the existence of the Hindu-hating Indian State. No wonder leaders like Narendra Modi can vow to avenge a certain faction of Hindu through his ‘Hisaab Chukta Abhiyaan’, or Udaynidhi Stalin can give a genocidal call to wipe out Sanatana Dharma, or Owaisi can give a call to Muslims to kill 100 crore Hindus in 15 minutes, or Judiciary can decide who will get entry into the garva-griha of Sabrimala temple, or when and how Visanjan activities of Durga Pratima would take place if Muharram and Dusserah are on the same date.

Hindus cannot mass-mobilize to cause havoc on the nation and the state, therefore Hindus are that silent majority who can be tricked and manipulated at whim by the political parties, and the judiciaries, and the Abrahamic ideologues.

Infinite Division of the Hindu Votebank and the ever-stronger Consolidation of the Muslim Votebank:

In spite of countless genocides to wipe out Hindus from the earth, Hindus are still 80% of the total population of India. Therefore, the political consolidation of Hindus brings the greatest uncertainties in the electoral calculations of the big parties like Congress or BJP.

Noone likes to live a life of unpredictability - especially the political Hyenas of India. Congress thinks that, after bagging the 15% Muslim votes, it is beneficial for them to divide Hindus along various fault lines like castes, food, language, Aryan-Dravidian binaries- to name a few. But BJP wants Hindutva to remain either loyal and confused, or rebel but weak. This is why BJP wants to subvert and manipulate Hinduism - its doctrine, symbols, stories, and Devtas. BJP destroys the ageless temples of Kashi, Ayodhya and Ujjain to replace them with stupid idols of Bharatmata - a concept which does not even exist in Hindu Dharma. BJP wants to see Shri Ram as a Mahapurush- a mortal human and not Bhagwan. BJP wants to support Ambedkarite movement and vows to avenge the so-called upper caste Hindus through Hisaab Chukta Abhiyaan and remains silent over the massacre of at least a dozen Brahmin families across India in the caste conflicts– just because OBC and SC-ST community are greater in population than the Brahmin communities.

Be it Congress or BJP, no party wants Hindu vote consolidation because it takes away the power from their elite few and gives the Hindu community the control to drive the polity in the Dharmik direction – the direction which has the capacity to resolve all binaries and hence the potential to destroy the venomous identity politics which is the oxygen of hitherto Indian politics.

Within India, it is not the Muslims who lead the jihaad in the twenty-first century– I mean the jihaad by the Muslims is atavist and predictable. It is the jihaad by BJP and Congress which is more worrisome – especially BJP because Hindus tend to think BJP is a Hindutva-vaadi party which it is not.

BJP is not fighting jihaad. BJP IS THE JIHAAD!

More the Number of Parties in the Left, More the ways to Subvert Hindutva:

This may sound paradoxical but imagine a situation where we have dozens of parties to the left of the political Overton window and only one party, e.g. Ekam Sanatan Bharat, to the right. Given that Hindu votes consolidate under the umbrella of Ekam Sanatan Bharat to elect this party to form the government, we might think that it is a Hindu conservative party that is in power, hence Hindus should be relieved of the fact that it can work seamlessly towards making Bharat a Hindu Rashtra.

But one should keep in mind that the resistance comes not from the ruling party but from the opposition. A dozen parties in the opposition means a dozen destructive narratives – destructive from the Hindu perspective because India has not given birth to a Hinduvaadi party yet (except Ekam Sanatan Bharat which is in its nascent stage as of now). More parties on the left, more ways there will be to subvert Hindutva. Hindus, being the meek and silent majority, would rarely oppose or even intimidate the parties for being anti-Hindu. This is a much more fatal scenario which will potentially lead to disintegration of the consciousness and unity of India because this unity, in the canonical sense, is the Hindu unity and nothing else.

What is the way out? The only way is the precedence of the Dharmik and not merely political consolidation of Hindus. Dharma is long term polity and polity is short-term Dharma, therefore it is Dharma that should guide the Hindus and their polity. Conversely, the Indian polity should engage itself in Hindu Triptikaran. It should declare Hindus as the generationally genocided global minority, and then offer schemes for Hindus based on his/her Hindu identity solely. It should declare scholarships to do research on Hindu genocides and find out how it can be reversed, for the Teerth Yatra across Holy Hindu sites, it should invest to rejuvenate the Hindu crafts and artefacts which bore the brunt of rampant destruction by the jihaadis, and lastly it should vow to the Hindus that it will work towards making India a Hindu Rashtra!